[Swan] net-to-net for road warriors
nick at howitts.co.uk
Sat Jan 26 16:38:39 UTC 2019
On 26/01/2019 16:22, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2019, at 03:54, Nick Howitt <nick at howitts.co.uk> wrote:
>>> all the tunnels seem to have come up, so likely this is now related to
>>> NAT or MASQUERADING rules. Or forwarding rules, or those nodes not
>>> having a gateway pointing to the VPN server for those remote subnets.
> No you cannot do that with subnetS=, only with singular subnet=
> It would be nice if we could extend that functionality to cover all combinatory cases with a multiple leftsourceip=188.8.131.52,184.108.40.206 but we don’t currently.
Ugh. That points to multiple conns then, doesn't it? I wouldn't have
thought the logic wouldn't be too difficult to implement (pick the
source IP from the subnet you are instantiating ...) but it is more time
More information about the Swan