[Swan] net-to-net for road warriors
paul at nohats.ca
Sat Jan 26 16:22:39 UTC 2019
On Jan 26, 2019, at 03:54, Nick Howitt <nick at howitts.co.uk> wrote:
>> all the tunnels seem to have come up, so likely this is now related to
>> NAT or MASQUERADING rules. Or forwarding rules, or those nodes not
>> having a gateway pointing to the VPN server for those remote subnets.
No you cannot do that with subnetS=, only with singular subnet=
It would be nice if we could extend that functionality to cover all combinatory cases with a multiple leftsourceip=126.96.36.199,188.8.131.52 but we don’t currently.
More information about the Swan