[Swan] Can you elaborate on this ?

Philippe Vouters philippe.vouters at laposte.net
Tue Jan 22 21:08:41 EET 2013


My so far personal experience with plutodebug=all is that it wants to be 
so verbose that it misses relevant facts. I have never been able to 
correctly exploit a plutodebug=all log, hence me giving my preference to 
a more selective log level.

Philippe Vouters (Fontainebleau/France)
URL: http://vouters.dyndns.org/
SIP: sip:Vouters at sip.linphone.org

Le 22/01/2013 19:37, Paul Wouters a écrit :
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Philippe Vouters wrote:
>
>> Further facts to be collected by Elison:
>> A Wireshark trace taken on the Librewan side filtered on 'src or dst 
>> <Netscreen IP address> udp port 500 or udp port 4500'. If Elison can 
>> put the Wireshark trace onto an FTP server so that I can download it 
>> and study it, this ought to be great. I would like to attempt to 
>> retrieve the rejected packet.
>
> the easiest way to get that packet is with plutodebug=all, which will
> include the in_struct() parser debugging with all payloads described.
>
> Paul
>



More information about the Swan mailing list