[Swan] Can you elaborate on this ?

[Paul Wouters]

On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Philippe Vouters wrote:

> My so far personal experience with plutodebug=all is that it wants to be so 
> verbose that it misses relevant facts. I have never been able to correctly 
> exploit a plutodebug=all log, hence me giving my preference to a more 
> selective log level.

"it" does not miss anything, but the human might.

I spend 10+ years reading their output, so I got used to its structure. In
my experience, it is easier to ask for all the information once, then
to ask for bits of partial logs using less verbosity multiple times.

Paul