[Swan-dev] Kernel 5.6.18-300.fc32.x86_64 VS Kernel 5.6.14-300.fc32.x86_64

Andrew Cagney andrew.cagney at gmail.com
Sat Jun 20 00:42:57 UTC 2020

On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 18:00, Paul Wouters <paul at nohats.ca> wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Jun 2020, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> > Rebuilding the testing VMs seems to have introduced a failure vis:
> >
> > pre-rebuild:
> https://testing.libreswan.org/v3.30-1022-g4bd4d18c0f-master/newoe-04-pass-pass/OUTPUT/
> >
> > post-rebuild (which has the effect of upgrading everything):
> >
> https://testing.libreswan.org/v3.30-1023-g5e4995c608-master/newoe-04-pass-pass/OUTPUT/road.console.diff
> > yes consecutive commits and nothing changed.
> >
> > the key difference, I'm assuming, is the kernel (however, it could be
> something else).
> It is caused by nic losing the IP info on its eth1.
> Which is because it is racing with eth0. Since it tries to add the route
> to a network for which it needs eth0, eth1 fails. Then eth0 establishes.
> I think the race is caused by having NetworkManager and systemd-networkd.
> On nic, run: rpm -e NetworkManager

I'm not so sure.

f32.ks already excludes it during the initial install and only a select
list of packages is updated (NetworkManager isn't on the list).  So adding
NetworkManager to the exclude list is just a safety net.

This run, which is working,
has everything on the short update list except the kernel & xl2tpd.

And, locally where things failed, NetworkManager isn't installed.

That fixed it for me on my laptop.
> Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.libreswan.org/pipermail/swan-dev/attachments/20200619/68ca501f/attachment.html>

More information about the Swan-dev mailing list