andrew.cagney at gmail.com
Thu Sep 5 03:55:22 UTC 2019
Look in nic.console.verbose.txt
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1567646808.958:61): arch=c000003e syscall=165
success=yes exit=0 a0=0 a1=55cef7279d60 a2=0 a3=1031 items=1 ppid=1
pid=486 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0
sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none)
I'm not sure what to do with them. Same with the KERNEL barfs we're triggering.
On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 23:48, D. Hugh Redelmeier <hugh at mimosa.com> wrote:
> A number of tests seem to be failing for a reason I don't understand.
> testing/pluto/ikev1-algo-esp-null-01 failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/ikev1-hostpair-01 failed east:output-different nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/ikev1-hostpair-02 failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/ikev2-hostpair-02 failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/ikev2-hostpair-03-initial-contact failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/newoe-18-cop-cop failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/newoe-18-cop-clear failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/newoe-18-private-poc failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/newoe-18-private-private failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/newoe-18-private-clear failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/newoe-18-clear-poc failed nic:%NULL road:output-different
> I *think* that's because testing/utils/fab/post.py line 295 is looking for
> a .../OUTPUT/nic.pluto.log and isn't finding one.
> There don't seem to be any nic.pluto.log files in any of the OUTPUT
> Is this error pointing out something broken in my setup, or is this
> warning spurious? I don't see this problem here:
> Swan-dev mailing list
> Swan-dev at lists.libreswan.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Swan-dev