[Swan-dev] odd error only on ppc64 on rhel6
Paul Wouters
paul at nohats.ca
Thu Jun 13 17:14:08 UTC 2019
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> | > | I'd rather see this case fixed properly by adding the missing
> | > | initializer, so we don't have to have custom flags passed between
> | > | different Linux distributions.
> | >
> | > As I explained last, this is not a bug in Libreswan. It is
> | > intentional and correct. I said this last time.
> |
> | Is there a way to rewrite the code not to trigger this issue. The
> | advantage is that we than don't need to track special gcc option
> | passing to various builds we do.
>
> I tried to explain twice: I expect (but haven't tested) that this flag can
> be passed to GCC on every build we do. Not just old ones.
I missed that option. I thought it would still be useful to not ignore
all of these.
> There's a lot of code that would need to be rewritten to avoid this
> warning. And it would make the code worse.
No. There is only 1 single instance of this causing a compile failure.
> | > The GCC project thinks this warning is too aggressive. That's why it
> | > doesn't show up in later versions of GCC.
> | >
> | > This is NOT a custom flag, as far as I know. Try it. I bet it works
> | > with all versions of GCC that we care about.
> |
> | I meant custom as "I need to do something custom for RHEL6/CentOS6 builds"
>
> I meant: "you can use this flag universally and don't need to do something
> custom for RHEL6/CentOS6 builds".
That is something we can do, but we would be adding this option on all
our builds to fix 1 specific initializer on one specific platform/gcc
version. That seems excessive and prone to a future "cleanup". But I'm
fine with this solution if that is the best we can do now.
Paul
More information about the Swan-dev
mailing list