[Swan-dev] naming v2 states

Paul Wouters paul at nohats.ca
Fri Aug 29 23:05:36 EEST 2014

On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Matt Rogers wrote:

> Subject: Re: [Swan-dev] naming v2 states
> I like the suggested set at the bottom there. I think avoiding calling the resulting states a CHILD and instead calling them IKE or IPSEC is a good idea. I also like the idea of incorporating the intended SA type in the CHILD exchange's state names.

Funny, I was hoping to keep the RFC names for the states, eg to keep
using CREATE_CHILD_XXX despite that it can create parents.


More information about the Swan-dev mailing list