[Swan-dev] naming v2 states

Matt Rogers mrogers at 0x83.com
Fri Aug 29 21:48:15 EEST 2014


I like the suggested set at the bottom there. I think avoiding calling the resulting states a CHILD and instead calling them IKE or IPSEC is a good idea. I also like the idea of incorporating the intended SA type in the CHILD exchange's state names.

 Matt



More information about the Swan-dev mailing list