[Swan] initial thoughts on uncrustifying libreswan
Paul Wouters
pwouters at redhat.com
Fri May 24 18:39:30 EEST 2013
On Fri, 24 May 2013, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>>> Now if you happen to need to do:
>>>
>>> code;
>>> more code;
>>> {
>>> int i;
>>>
>>> for (i=0; i<5; i++) {
>>> code;
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> well then I just question what you are doing.
>>
>> What's wrong with trying to keep variable scope as local as possible?
>
> Nothing, but C doesn't require a block to do that anymore.
func()
{
code;
more code;
int foo;
even more code using foo;
even even more code not using foo;
}
What is the scope of foo end?
now compare:
func()
{
code;
more code;
{
int foo;
even more code using foo;
}
even even more code not using foo;
}
Paul
More information about the Swan
mailing list