[Swan] initial thoughts on uncrustifying libreswan

[Lennart Sorensen]

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:14:10AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> I agree it is not needed. I prefer it but I'm happy to go for
> consistency and give it up.
> 
> I think that has all to do with emacs/vim and quick code navigation.

Could be.  I think it is an odd exception, but I can deal with it
given function declarations are not the same thing as control blocks in
the code.

-- 
Len Sorensen