[Swan] initial thoughts on uncrustifying libreswan
Lennart Sorensen
lsorense at csclub.uwaterloo.ca
Fri May 24 16:55:58 EEST 2013
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 05:38:57PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> I am guilty of that. When I'm in doubt, I always add more. But I have no
> issues with people or uncrustifiers to remove them for me if they are
> redundant.
Well better to have correct code after all.
> I tend to use them if there is still "work to be done", eg:
>
> return (1+1)
Fair enough. But would you do it if passing it as an argument to a function?
ie:
foo(1+1, 2);
or
foo((1+1), 2);
?
> Even when declaring a buch of new variables?
What do new variables have to do with where braces go?
> I'm happy with that too. Iadon't think it would be adding that many lines
> actually.
Hopefully not.
> I'd prefer {}
Certainly seems better than just ';'.
I still question whether there is ever a good reason to hit the situation.
--
Len Sorensen
More information about the Swan
mailing list