[Swan] initial thoughts on uncrustifying libreswan

[David McCullough]

Paul Wouters wrote the following:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013, David McCullough wrote:
> 
> > I don't want the logging removed :-)
> 
> However, I would prefer if we could bring the number of logging
> functions down to perhaps two or three? I think we might actually
> have more then a dozen now :)

Yes,  agreed completely.  one would suffice ;-)

> libreswan_log(), loglog(), DBG_log(), plog(), whack_log(), syslog(),
> exit_log(), nss_symkey_log), log_errno(), exit_log_errno(), log_debug(),
> log_fatal(), log_mpidump()
> 
> Specifically, the duplicate logging fuctions in programs/pluto/log.[ch]
> and lib/libswan/lswlog.[ch]  (both of same name, eg loglog())
> 
> Note, if we drop support for #undef DEBUG, then the DBG_log() might
> be able to get simplified as well?

All for cleaning the logs up ;-)

Cheers,
Davidm

-- 
David McCullough,  ucdevel at gmail.com,   Ph: 0410 560 763