[Swan] zlib
Paul Wouters
pwouters at redhat.com
Fri May 24 00:42:39 EEST 2013
On Thu, 23 May 2013, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> The uncrustify changes were backed out for libreswan's copy of zlib. I
> can only guess why (not really our code?).
>
> Why do we even have a zlib? Surely there are already copies in the
> kernel?
I already have a pending patch that puts #ifdef __KERNEL__ around it to
ensure userland does not use it. Currently, it does not. Only KLIPS uses
it.
> If we have to have our own, why is it not at least somewhat segregated
> from the rest of the code (say, in a subdirectory)?
Yes we could. ideally, we use the zlib code of the kernel and get rid of
all of the below files.
Paul
> Based on the back-out commit, this is the list of files from zlib:
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/adler32.c
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/deflate.c
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/deflate.h
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/infblock.c
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/infblock.h
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/infcodes.c
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/infcodes.h
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/inffast.c
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/inffast.h
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/inffixed.h
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/inflate.c
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/inftrees.c
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/inftrees.h
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/infutil.c
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/infutil.h
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/trees.c
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/trees.h
> libreswan/linux/net/ipsec/zutil.c
> _______________________________________________
> Swan mailing list
> Swan at lists.libreswan.org
> https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan
>
More information about the Swan
mailing list