[Swan] Phasing out #ifdef DEBUG ?

Paul Wouters pwouters at redhat.com
Sun Mar 17 05:36:14 EET 2013


On Sat, 16 Mar 2013, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:

> Clearly nobody builds without DEBUG because the build doesn't work.
> Not that it cannot be fixed, only that it is a proof that nobody
> cares.
>
> I kind of like the discipline of DEBUG but don't think that the memory
> saving is worthwhile given the maintenance/testing costs.
>
> Do any embedded folk care?  Are they likely to speak up?

Some did, but they were talking about the addition of libnss :)

Once we have an option to choose between openssl and nss, I think
they'll be happy enough to not care about the DEBUG stuff.

Paul


More information about the Swan mailing list