[Swan] 3.1 rpm package

Philippe Vouters philippe.vouters at laposte.net
Sat Mar 16 15:34:24 EET 2013


Nick,
One possible cause is a mismatch of the ike/phase2alg with the remote 
peer. Up to you to see whether this applies.
  ike=aes256-sha1;modp2048
  phase2alg=aes256

Philippe Vouters (Fontainebleau/France)
URL: http://vouters.dyndns.org/
SIP: sip:Vouters at sip.linphone.org

Le 16/03/2013 12:52, Nick Howitt a écrit :
> It is there in https://download.libreswan.org/binaries/rhel/ but I 
> can't get it to work :(
>
> I have installed it and with identical configs to openswan all I get 
> in my logs is:
> Mar 16 11:43:59 server pluto[10870]: packet from 88.104.26.203:500: 
> received Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection]
> Mar 16 11:43:59 server pluto[10870]: packet from 88.104.26.203:500: 
> received Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947]
> Mar 16 11:43:59 server pluto[10870]: packet from 88.104.26.203:500: 
> ignoring Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03]
> Mar 16 11:43:59 server pluto[10870]: packet from 88.104.26.203:500: 
> ignoring Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n]
> Mar 16 11:43:59 server pluto[10870]: packet from 88.104.26.203:500: 
> ignoring Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02]
> Mar 16 11:43:59 server pluto[10870]: packet from 88.104.26.203:500: 
> received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00]
> Mar 16 11:43:59 server pluto[10870]: packet from 88.104.26.203:500: 
> initial Main Mode message received on 82.19.147.85:500 but no 
> connection has been authorized with policy=PSK
>
> My Ipsec.conf is:
> # The config file changed quite a bit from 1.x.
> # See 
> http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/freeswan-2.00/doc/upgrading.html
>
> version 2.0
>
> # Default policy
> #---------------
>
> config setup
>     interfaces=%defaultroute
>     plutodebug=none    # plutodebug="all crypt"
>     # plutodebug=controlmore
>     klipsdebug=none
>     oe=no
>     protostack=netkey    # 2.6.x only
> virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8,%v4:192.168.0.0/16,%v4:172.16.0.0/12,%v4:!192.168.2.0/24,%v4:!192.168.3.0/24
>     nat_traversal=yes
>
>
> conn %default
>     type=tunnel
>     authby=secret
>
> # Tunnels defined in separate files
> #----------------------------------
>
> include /etc/ipsec.d/ipsec.*.conf
>
>
> One of the sub files, /etc/ipsec.d/ipsec.unmanaged.MumIn.conf, is:
> conn MumIn
>  type=tunnel
>  authby=secret
>  dpdtimeout=120
>  dpddelay=30
>  auto=add
>  left=%defaultroute
>  leftsourceip=192.168.2.1
>  leftsubnet=192.168.2.0/24
>  leftid=@Nick
>  right=%any
>  rightsubnet=192.168.10.0/24
>  salifetime=24h
>  dpdaction=clear
>  ikelifetime=24h
>  ike=aes256-sha1;modp2048
>  phase2alg=aes256
>  rekey=no
>
> The secrets file contains:
> @Nick %any : PSK "PSK_Here"
>
> This happens for both my remote locations. One is behind NAT, the 
> other is not.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nick
>
> On 16/03/2013 11:42, T.J. Yang wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Is there outstanding/roadblock  issue ?
>> Hoping you can release libreswan 3.1 CentOS/RHEL 6 package to repo soon.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> tj
>>
>> -- 
>> T.J. Yang
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Swan mailing list
>> Swan at lists.libreswan.org
>> https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Swan mailing list
> Swan at lists.libreswan.org
> https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.libreswan.org/pipermail/swan/attachments/20130316/df92943a/attachment.html>


More information about the Swan mailing list