[Swan] \n in DBG_log

Paul Wouters paul at nohats.ca
Mon Feb 11 07:19:59 EET 2013


On Sun, 10 Feb 2013, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:

> I think that \n in DBG_log is pointless.
>
> When I do
> 	find * -name '*.[ch]' -print0 | xargs -0 -r egrep -n '\<DBG_log.*\\n\>'
>
> I get about 100 hits.  That doesn't count cases where the format is on another line.
>
> This should be tidied up.

I've filed a bug for this to do this after the 3.1 release.

https://bugs.libreswan.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65

Paul


More information about the Swan mailing list