[Swan] \n in DBG_log

D. Hugh Redelmeier hugh at mimosa.com
Mon Feb 11 05:31:50 EET 2013


I think that \n in DBG_log is pointless.

When I do
	find * -name '*.[ch]' -print0 | xargs -0 -r egrep -n '\<DBG_log.*\\n\>'

I get about 100 hits.  That doesn't count cases where the format is on another line.

This should be tidied up.


More information about the Swan mailing list