[Swan] Aggressive mode not possible with Juniper Netscreen
Elison Niven
elison.niven at cyberoam.com
Tue Jan 22 12:38:13 EET 2013
Hi,
Also Phase 1 on Libreswan is not complete as ipsec auto --status does
not say that ISAKMP SA established.
#ipsec auto --status | tail
000 #527: "jun":500 STATE_AGGR_R1 (sent AR1, expecting AI2);
EVENT_RETRANSMIT in 22s; nodpd; idle; import:respond to stranger
On Tuesday 22 January 2013 09:28:53 AM IST, Elison Niven wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks.
> But then libreswan says:
> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: "jun" #1: Quick Mode message
> is unacceptable because it is for an incomplete ISAKMP SA"
>
> On Monday 21 January 2013 06:45:50 PM IST, Philippe Vouters wrote:
>> I am NOT misleading you at all. Read your traces. Libreswan says this:
>>
>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | phase 1 is done, looking
>> for phase 2 to unpend
>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | complete state transition
>> with STF_INLINE
>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | complete state transition
>> with STF_INLINE
>>
>> So Libreswan is already in phase 2 before it says:
>>
>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: "jun" #1: packet rejected:
>> should have been encrypted
>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: "jun" #1: sending
>> notification INVALID_FLAGS to 10.103.2.75:500
>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | sending 40 bytes for
>> notification packet through p18p1:500 to 10.103.2.75:500 (using #1)
>>
>> And you should retrieve this INVALID_FLAGS notification from
>> Libnreswan in your Netscreen traces. Set Netscreen to a more
>> appropriate log level and you'll find this notification.
>>
>> Philippe Vouters (Fontainebleau/France)
>> URL: http://vouters.dyndns.org/
>> SIP: sip:Vouters at sip.linphone.org
>>
>> Le 21/01/2013 12:01, Elison Niven a écrit :
>>> No, you are mistaken.
>>> According to Netscreen, Phase 1 is completed.
>>> According to Libreswan, Phase 1 is incomplete.
>>> These logs are of the Netscreen :
>>> 2013-01-18 21:19:38 info IKE<10.103.6.114> Phase 2: Initiated
>>> negotiations.
>>>
>>> On Monday 21 January 2013 04:26:59 PM IST, Philippe Vouters wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Run Wireshark on the Libreswan side and locate the network packet
>>>> coming from Netscreen which is not using the ESP protocol when it
>>>> should. According to your Libreswan traces, you are in phase 2.
>>>>
>>>> Philippe Vouters (Fontainebleau/France)
>>>> URL: http://vouters.dyndns.org/
>>>> SIP: sip:Vouters at sip.linphone.org
>>>>
>>>> Le 21/01/2013 05:25, Elison Niven a écrit :
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday 20 January 2013 04:54:43 AM IST, Paul Wouters wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Philippe Vouters wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In summary, it looks to me there are two issues here :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1/ Libreswan could be wrongly issuing the packet rejected message
>>>>>>> meanwhile taking the corresponding action.
>>>>>>> 2/ Another problem you seem to face is on your Netscreen side (your
>>>>>>> traces). At the time of the Libreswan packet rejected message,
>>>>>>> Netscreen would wrongly assume it is already phase 2 while
>>>>>>> Libreswan
>>>>>>> is still keeping in phase 1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm pretty sure this is 2)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a mismatch in configuration.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I do not see how this is a mismatch in the configuration as when
>>>>> Libreswan initiates the connection, it is working fine!
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are the logs on libreswan with plutodebug=control :
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: |
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | *received 324 bytes from
>>>>> 10.103.2.75:500 on p18p1 (port=500)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | processing version=1.0
>>>>> packet with exchange type=ISAKMP_XCHG_AGGR (4)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: packet from 10.103.2.75:500:
>>>>> ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload
>>>>> [4a4340b543e02b84c88a8b96a8af9ebe77d9accc0000000b00000500]
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: packet from 10.103.2.75:500:
>>>>> received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00]
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: packet from 10.103.2.75:500:
>>>>> ignoring Vendor ID payload [HeartBeat Notify 386b0100]
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | creating state object #1
>>>>> at 0x988ffc8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: "jun" #1: Aggressive mode
>>>>> peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '10.103.2.75'
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | started looking for secret
>>>>> for 10.103.6.114->10.103.2.75 of kind PPK_PSK
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | actually looking for
>>>>> secret for 10.103.6.114->10.103.2.75 of kind PPK_PSK
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.2.75 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 4
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 12
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 4: match=12
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | best_match 0>12
>>>>> best=0x988cbb0 (line=4)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key %any to
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 2
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 10
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 3: match=10
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | match(10) was not
>>>>> best_match(12)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.7.41 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 0
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 2: match=8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.7.155 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 0
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 1: match=8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | concluding with
>>>>> best_match=12 best=0x988cbb0 (lineno=4)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | offered CA: '%none'
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | processing connection jun
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | ICOOKIE: 6c 23 d9 65 fa
>>>>> 87 ba 23
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | RCOOKIE: 94 46 8a 37 2d
>>>>> 46 ff 8d
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | state hash entry 23
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | inserting state object #1
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | inserting event
>>>>> EVENT_SO_DISCARD, timeout in 0 seconds for #1
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: "jun" #1: responding to
>>>>> Aggressive Mode, state #1, connection "jun" from 10.103.2.75
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: "jun" #1: enabling possible
>>>>> NAT-traversal with method draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00/01
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | started looking for secret
>>>>> for 10.103.6.114->10.103.2.75 of kind PPK_PSK
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | actually looking for
>>>>> secret for 10.103.6.114->10.103.2.75 of kind PPK_PSK
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.2.75 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 4
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 12
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 4: match=12
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | best_match 0>12
>>>>> best=0x988cbb0 (line=4)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key %any to
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 2
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 10
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 3: match=10
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | match(10) was not
>>>>> best_match(12)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.7.41 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 0
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 2: match=8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.7.155 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 0
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 1: match=8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | concluding with
>>>>> best_match=12 best=0x988cbb0 (lineno=4)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | helper -1 doing
>>>>> build_kenonce op id: 0
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | processing connection jun
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | started looking for secret
>>>>> for 10.103.6.114->10.103.2.75 of kind PPK_PSK
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | actually looking for
>>>>> secret for 10.103.6.114->10.103.2.75 of kind PPK_PSK
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.2.75 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 4
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 12
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 4: match=12
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | best_match 0>12
>>>>> best=0x988cbb0 (line=4)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key %any to
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 2
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 10
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 3: match=10
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | match(10) was not
>>>>> best_match(12)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.7.41 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 0
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 2: match=8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.7.155 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 0
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 1: match=8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | concluding with
>>>>> best_match=12 best=0x988cbb0 (lineno=4)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | parent1 type: 7 group: 2
>>>>> len: 2680
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | helper -1 doing compute
>>>>> dh+iv op id: 0
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | processing connection jun
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | thinking about whether to
>>>>> send my certificate:
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | I have RSA key:
>>>>> OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY cert.type: CERT_NONE
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | sendcert:
>>>>> CERT_ALWAYSSEND and I did not get a certificate request
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | so do not send cert.
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | I did not send a
>>>>> certificate because digital signatures are not being used. (PSK)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | I am not sending a
>>>>> certificate request
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | started looking for secret
>>>>> for 10.103.6.114->10.103.2.75 of kind PPK_PSK
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | actually looking for
>>>>> secret for 10.103.6.114->10.103.2.75 of kind PPK_PSK
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.2.75 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 4
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 12
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 4: match=12
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | best_match 0>12
>>>>> best=0x988cbb0 (line=4)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key %any to
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 2
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 10
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 3: match=10
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | match(10) was not
>>>>> best_match(12)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.7.41 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 0
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 2: match=8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 1: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.7.155 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 0
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 2: compared key
>>>>> 10.103.6.114 to 10.103.6.114 / 10.103.2.75 -> 8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | line 1: match=8
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | concluding with
>>>>> best_match=12 best=0x988cbb0 (lineno=4)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | complete state transition
>>>>> with STF_OK
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: "jun" #1: transition from
>>>>> state STATE_AGGR_R0 to state STATE_AGGR_R1
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | sending reply packet to
>>>>> 10.103.2.75:500 (from port 500)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | sending 356 bytes for
>>>>> STATE_AGGR_R0 through p18p1:500 to 10.103.2.75:500 (using #1)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | inserting event
>>>>> EVENT_RETRANSMIT, timeout in 10 seconds for #1
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: "jun" #1: STATE_AGGR_R1:
>>>>> sent AR1, expecting AI2
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | modecfg pull: noquirk
>>>>> policy:push not-client
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | phase 1 is done, looking
>>>>> for phase 2 to unpend
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | complete state transition
>>>>> with STF_INLINE
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | complete state transition
>>>>> with STF_INLINE
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | * processed 0 messages
>>>>> from cryptographic helpers
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | next event
>>>>> EVENT_RETRANSMIT in 10 seconds for #1
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | next event
>>>>> EVENT_RETRANSMIT in 10 seconds for #1
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: |
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | *received 100 bytes from
>>>>> 10.103.2.75:500 on p18p1 (port=500)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | processing version=1.0
>>>>> packet with exchange type=ISAKMP_XCHG_AGGR (4)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | ICOOKIE: 6c 23 d9 65 fa
>>>>> 87 ba 23
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | RCOOKIE: 94 46 8a 37 2d
>>>>> 46 ff 8d
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | state hash entry 23
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | v1 peer and cookies match
>>>>> on #1, provided msgid 00000000 vs 00000000
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | v1 state object #1 found,
>>>>> in STATE_AGGR_R1
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | processing connection jun
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: "jun" #1: packet rejected:
>>>>> should have been encrypted
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: "jun" #1: sending
>>>>> notification INVALID_FLAGS to 10.103.2.75:500
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | sending 40 bytes for
>>>>> notification packet through p18p1:500 to 10.103.2.75:500 (using #1)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | * processed 0 messages
>>>>> from cryptographic helpers
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | next event
>>>>> EVENT_RETRANSMIT in 10 seconds for #1
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | next event
>>>>> EVENT_RETRANSMIT in 10 seconds for #1
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: |
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | *received 348 bytes from
>>>>> 10.103.2.75:500 on p18p1 (port=500)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | processing version=1.0
>>>>> packet with exchange type=ISAKMP_XCHG_QUICK (32)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | ICOOKIE: 6c 23 d9 65 fa
>>>>> 87 ba 23
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | RCOOKIE: 94 46 8a 37 2d
>>>>> 46 ff 8d
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | state hash entry 23
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | v1 peer and cookies match
>>>>> on #1, provided msgid e4c27ed0 vs 00000000
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | v1 state object not found
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | ICOOKIE: 6c 23 d9 65 fa
>>>>> 87 ba 23
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | RCOOKIE: 94 46 8a 37 2d
>>>>> 46 ff 8d
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | state hash entry 23
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | v1 peer and cookies match
>>>>> on #1, provided msgid 00000000 vs 00000000
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | v1 state object #1 found,
>>>>> in STATE_AGGR_R1
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | processing connection jun
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: "jun" #1: Quick Mode message
>>>>> is unacceptable because it is for an incomplete ISAKMP SA
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | payload malformed after IV
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 8d 48 d8 bb c7 43 10 96
>>>>> a1 f5 f1 52 9d c1 d5 c0
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 15 8f be 33
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: "jun" #1: sending
>>>>> notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.103.2.75:500
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | sending 40 bytes for
>>>>> notification packet through p18p1:500 to 10.103.2.75:500 (using #1)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | * processed 0 messages
>>>>> from cryptographic helpers
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | next event
>>>>> EVENT_RETRANSMIT in 10 seconds for #1
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:47 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | next event
>>>>> EVENT_RETRANSMIT in 10 seconds for #1
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: |
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | *received 348 bytes from
>>>>> 10.103.2.75:500 on p18p1 (port=500)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | processing version=1.0
>>>>> packet with exchange type=ISAKMP_XCHG_QUICK (32)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | ICOOKIE: 6c 23 d9 65 fa
>>>>> 87 ba 23
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | RCOOKIE: 94 46 8a 37 2d
>>>>> 46 ff 8d
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | state hash entry 23
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | v1 peer and cookies match
>>>>> on #1, provided msgid e4c27ed0 vs 00000000
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | v1 state object not found
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | ICOOKIE: 6c 23 d9 65 fa
>>>>> 87 ba 23
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | RCOOKIE: 94 46 8a 37 2d
>>>>> 46 ff 8d
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | state hash entry 23
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | v1 peer and cookies match
>>>>> on #1, provided msgid 00000000 vs 00000000
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | v1 state object #1 found,
>>>>> in STATE_AGGR_R1
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | processing connection jun
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: "jun" #1: Quick Mode message
>>>>> is unacceptable because it is for an incomplete ISAKMP SA
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | payload malformed after IV
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 8d 48 d8 bb c7 43 10 96
>>>>> a1 f5 f1 52 9d c1 d5 c0
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | 15 8f be 33
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: "jun" #1: sending
>>>>> notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.103.2.75:500
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | sending 40 bytes for
>>>>> notification packet through p18p1:500 to 10.103.2.75:500 (using #1)
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | * processed 0 messages
>>>>> from cryptographic helpers
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | next event
>>>>> EVENT_RETRANSMIT in 6 seconds for #1
>>>>> Jan 21 09:53:51 elisonniven pluto[4299]: | next event
>>>>> EVENT_RETRANSMIT in 6 seconds for #1
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Elison Niven
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Elison Niven
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Elison Niven
>
> _______________________________________________
> Swan mailing list
> Swan at lists.libreswan.org
> https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan
--
Best Regards,
Elison Niven
More information about the Swan
mailing list