[Swan-dev] Cut status, was Fwd: [Swan-commit] Changes to ref refs/heads/main

[Andrew Cagney]

On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 15:19, Paul Wouters <paul at nohats.ca> wrote:

>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* Andrew Cagney <cagney at vault.libreswan.fi>
> *Date:* April 5, 2021 at 14:49:53 EDT
> *To:* swan-commit at lists.libreswan.org
> *Subject:* *[Swan-commit] Changes to ref refs/heads/main*
> *Reply-To:* swan-dev at lists.libreswan.org
>
> New commits:
> commit f2e9404f55bb3e8e40a9bf1f4cb28e198cb90603
> Author: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu.org>
> Date:   Mon Apr 5 14:49:11 2021 -0400
>
>    testing: drop silent '==cut== ; ipsec status ; ==tuc==' in final.sh
>
>
> This used to be done so test result logfiles  could be checked against
> status output without needing to rerun a test.
>

Some tests, in final.sh, run either:
  ipsec status
or
   ipsec-look.sh
so the result is embedded in the end of *.console.txt.  I suspect that this
is, in part, so that the responder (east) gets its status verified.

Here though, the command is something like:
   : === cut ===
    ipsec status
   : === tuc ===
so the output isn't being verified (it is hiding in *.console.verbose.txt)



>
> I think in general, it is not used much. Especially with namespaces being
> a super quick retest away. So I am okay with it, but just wanted to share
> this in case others don’t agree.
>
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Swan-dev mailing list
> Swan-dev at lists.libreswan.org
> https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.libreswan.org/pipermail/swan-dev/attachments/20210405/8510975e/attachment.html>