[Swan-dev] testing: stabilize newoe-25-cat-4

Paul Wouters paul at nohats.ca
Sat Feb 8 15:05:41 UTC 2020


The reason I did t use ping-once is because it seems bound to a —up or —down and I didn’t want the connection modified ?

Am I misunderstanding the script?

A lot of carefully timed tests will fail with a 3 second random delay though. Especially those engineered with short timers 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 7, 2020, at 21:43, Andrew Cagney <andrew.cagney at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 16:45, Paul Wouters <paul at vault.libreswan.fi> wrote:
> > commit e70651a682602916773c0a09fa12a7ac8bda8c0e
> > Author: Paul Wouters <pwouters at redhat.com>
> > Date:   Fri Feb 7 16:28:22 2020 -0500
> >
> >     testing: stabilize newoe-25-cat-4
> >
> 
> road #
> sleep 3
> 
> waiting a magic 3 seconds isn't more stable - load the machine and watch it fail.  Nor is 'ping -n -c 3' (it can send 4 pings).   Try this:
> road #
>  # trigger OE
> road #
>  ../../pluto/bin/ping-once.sh --down -I 192.1.3.209 192.1.2.23
> down
> road #
>  ../../pluto/bin/wait-for.sh --match '"private-or-clear#192.1.2.0/24"' -- ipsec whack --trafficstatus
> 006 #2: "private-or-clear#192.1.2.0/24"[1] ...192.1.2.23, type=ESP, add_time=1234567890, inBytes=0, outBytes=0, id='ID_NULL'
> road #
>  ../../pluto/bin/ping-once.sh --up   -I 192.1.3.209 192.1.2.23
> up
> 
> 
> 
> road #
> ping -n -c 3 -I 192.1.3.209 192.1.2.23
> PING 192.1.2.23 (192.1.2.23) from 192.1.3.209 : 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 192.1.2.23: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.XXX ms
> 64 bytes from 192.1.2.23: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.XXX ms
> 64 bytes from 192.1.2.23: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.XXX ms
> 64 bytes from 192.1.2.23: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.XXX ms
> --- 192.1.2.23 ping statistics ---
> 4 packets transmitted, 3 received, 25% packet loss, time XXXX
> 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time XXXX
> _______________________________________________
> Swan-dev mailing list
> Swan-dev at lists.libreswan.org
> https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.libreswan.org/pipermail/swan-dev/attachments/20200208/036ca8f8/attachment.html>


More information about the Swan-dev mailing list