[Swan-dev] savage regression in test results

[Andrew Cagney]

On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 07:34, Tuomo Soini <tis at foobar.fi> wrote:

> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:56:54 -0400 (EDT)
> Paul Wouters <paul at nohats.ca> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 14:26, Paul Wouters <paul at nohats.ca> wrote:
> > >       I am aware - the good thing is we are on f30, ready for
> > > rhel8/centos8 and can pick namespaces or kvm with roughly the same
> > > result. I’m working on getting us back to “normal”
> > >
> > >
> > > KVM_OS points at fedora28?
>
>
as in:

   mk/kvm-targets.mk:KVM_OS = fedora28


> > Wasn't that the OS of the host? not of the guests?
> > I think I changed libreswan-web/slave/Makefile.inc.local to
> > KVM_OS=fedora30
>

It's the guest (the test framework should be host agnostic).

This explains why trying to compare local results with testing has been an
exercise in frustration - it's not been testing top-of-tree.

Per Tuomo's suggestion, I'll rename KVM_OS to KVM_GUEST_OS (and
KVM_VARIANT_OS which is a hack to pacify a libvirt warning).

We've an f30 tester set up under f30/ (see earlier posts).  I'll re-start
it as in:

  cd f30 ; rm -f nohup.out ; nohup master/testing/web/tester.sh slave/
results/ &

I've also made results/ a soft-link to ../testing/f30 so that they can be
seen under https://testing.libreswan.org/f30/



> I've been confused with the KVM_OS / KVM_VARIANT_OS variables before
> > especially in the testing.libreswan master/slave setup.
>
> Correct naming would be KVM_HOST_OS and KVM_GUEST_OS.
>
>
> --
> Tuomo Soini <tis at foobar.fi>
> Foobar Linux services
> +358 40 5240030
> Foobar Oy <https://foobar.fi/>
> _______________________________________________
> Swan-dev mailing list
> Swan-dev at lists.libreswan.org
> https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.libreswan.org/pipermail/swan-dev/attachments/20190806/b68537d7/attachment-0001.html>