[Swan-dev] are waiting for f28 or for big changes?

Paul Wouters paul at nohats.ca
Mon Jul 16 23:36:19 UTC 2018

> On Jul 16, 2018, at 19:27, Andrew Cagney <andrew.cagney at gmail.com> wrote:
> - sort it - they are currently ordered by the host dependent SADB ID!
> - update the listed names/values - use ike_alg values
>> From experience I know these never go to plan :-(   It might even be
> easier to strip out most of the cases where the kernel algorithms are
> being listed - not material to the unit under test.

If I update a test case that has ipsec status, I almost always replace it with “ipsec status | grep connname” for exactly this reason.


More information about the Swan-dev mailing list