[Swan-dev] test directories completely missing from TESTLIST

[Andrew Cagney]

Way better, we've really weeded out a lot.   Here's what's left:

Antony Antony

2014-06-24 1182f3868 ikev2-22-retransmit
2014-06-30 5702cdb28 ikev2-23-mixed
2014-11-09 16a973499 ikev2-34-lxc
2014-12-02 bffc36e74 ikev2-24-cryptoload-253
2014-12-02 bffc36e74 ikev2-37-docker-rw
2015-05-22 a8c95e136 ikev2-09-rw-oe-rsa
2015-05-22 a8c95e136 ikev2-09-rw-rsa-oe
2015-05-27 78675e045 ikev2-24-cryptoload-253-nhelper-1
2015-05-27 78675e045 ikev2-24-cryptoload-253-nhelper-300
2016-06-23 cc45b1740 ikev2-52-rw-replace-ping-f
2017-01-12 9b78f3829 ikev2-initial-contact-send
2017-02-18 83f4536ae certoe-12-nat-server
2017-04-11 dced0ca65 ikev2-57-restart
2017-05-22 9da04e4ec ikev2-58-rawrsa-idmismatch
2017-05-22 9da04e4ec ikev2-dnssec-fqdn-01
2017-12-19 543fc17b3 ikev2-child-rekey-05

Matt Rogers

2014-04-06 5978ff788 interop-ikev1-strongswan-05-x509ec-sendcert

Michael Richardson

2005-11-02 7836dfce2 nat-double-01
2005-11-02 7836dfce2 nat-transport-03
2007-05-18 0c2c1b5af whackrecord-01

On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 at 15:50, Paul Wouters <paul at nohats.ca> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> >>> Paul Wouters
> >>>
> >>> 2008-02-17 0239d2c4a bad-nexthop-01
> >>
> >> To be written (see description.txt) should get a code fix in future.
> >> Please leave in the list as failing
> >
> > as in add it to TESTLIST as wip?
>
> oops, done now.
>
> > For the 'fixed' tests, do they still need to be added to TESTLIST as good?
>
> oops, done now :)
>
> >>> 2015-08-23 0b0ce1116 ikev2-45-impair-gx
>
> That one was covered by ikev2-45-impair-gx-01 + ikev2-45-impair-gx-02,
> so removed.
>
> >>> 2016-05-24 bed1f76a5 klips-ikev2-liveness-01
> >>
> >> Didn't investigate yet.
>
> added as wip
>
> >>> 2017-09-15 98bdb1bc5 ikev2-child-re-up-01
>
> added as wip
>
> >>> 2018-04-23 baf51f4e4 ikev2-26-keyingtries
> >>
> >> This fails and shows a real bug. If we issue --up and it fails, once
> >> the whack comes back there is no more background state trying to
> >> connect. This is a release blocker.
>
> left as good. it should be good. we need to fix the code.
>
> Paul