[Swan-dev] should final.sh shut down pluto?
andrew.cagney at gmail.com
Mon Jun 27 00:34:22 UTC 2016
On 24 June 2016 at 21:22, Andrew Cagney <andrew.cagney at gmail.com> wrote:
>> teardown.sh sounds like final.sh
> Obviously. But notice how "i*", "r*", and "t*" are in alphabetic
> order so the script run order can easily be determined using "LANG=C
> ls -1 *.sh" (or the python equivalent); perhaps you have better names
> that capture the same intent and preserve alpabetic ordering (which
> can't be said of *init.sh *run.sh NN*.sh and final.sh).
What about this, instead let the names specify that they can run on
multiple machines. For instance:
00-east-west.sh -- run on east, then run on west
99-west-east.sh -- again, but this time on west, and then on east
More information about the Swan-dev