[Swan-dev] encrypted informational message when in state R1?

[Andrew Cagney]

On 18 February 2015 at 20:25, Paul Wouters <paul at nohats.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:

> STATE_PARENT_R2 also suports informationals, like liveness probes.
>
>> I continue to think that these are terrible state names.
>
>
> Everybody agrees.
>
>> STATE_PARENT_R1 => STATE_INIT_R
>> STATE_PARENT_R2 => STATE_AUTH_R

> That would work, andso would:
>
> STATE_PARENT_I1 => STATE_INIT_I
> STATE_PARENT_I2 => STATE_AUTH_I
>
> I'm not sure what STATE_PARENT_I3 should be called.

STATE_V2_ESTABLISHED.

I'll push the following rename:

STATE_PARENT_R1 -> STATE_V2_INIT_R
STATE_PARENT_I1 -> STATE_V2_INIT_I
STATE_PARENT_I2 -> STATE_V2_AUTH_I
STATE_PARENT_I3 -> STATE_V2_ESTABLISHED

I'm going to leave STATE_PARENT_R2 unchanged for reasons that deserve
a new thread.
(btw the corresponding state_names table is out-of-date, I'll fix that).

Andrew