[Swan-dev] broken delete behaviour on ikev2 ?

[Antony Antony]

Another data point, in master for other testcase I see the message from Aug 14th. I am not familiar with these testcases, so  don't know how to interpret them yet. Are these dpds or delete due reauth/rekey. Lets look at them later.

2014-08-14-blackswan-v3.9-252-gf808d8a-master/ikev2-17-rekey/OUTPUT/east.pluto.log:packet from 192.1.2.45:500: received
too old retransmit: 1 < 2
2014-08-14-blackswan-v3.9-252-gf808d8a-master/ikev2-17-rekey/OUTPUT/east.pluto.log:packet from 192.1.2.45:500: received
too old retransmit: 1 < 2
2014-08-14-blackswan-v3.9-252-gf808d8a-master/ikev2-17-rekey/OUTPUT/east.pluto.log:packet from 192.1.2.45:500: received
too old retransmit: 1 < 2
2014-08-14-blackswan-v3.9-252-gf808d8a-master/ikev2-19-x509-auto-start/OUTPUT/east.pluto.log:packet from 192.1.3.209:500
: received too old retransmit: 1 < 2

The fist one I mentioned was for delete test cases.
-antony


On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:20:54AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Antony Antony wrote:
> 
> >>This must have shown up in our running testcases?  Antony, can you see
> >>when this failure started?
> >
> >59b6278 is the first time it showed up in testcase  ikev2-delete-02
> >2014-09-05-blackswan-v3.10-54-g59b6278-hugh-2014aug/ikev2-delete-02/OUTPUT/east.pluto.log:packet from 192.1.2.45:500: received too old retransmit: 1 < 2
> 
> commit 59b62786b8f25b96bb5a23a1a8621eab11caa5ab
> Merge: dfcc5a3 0a4ca86
> Author: Antony Antony <antony at phenome.org>
> Date:   Sat Aug 30 02:46:14 2014 -0500
> 
>     Merge branch 'hugh-2014aug' of
> vault.libreswan.org:/srv/src/libreswan into h
> 
> 
> so it come to your testruns via master. Guess bisecting it is.....
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul
>