[Swan-dev] atoi -- just say no
Matt Rogers
mrogers at redhat.com
Mon May 19 17:31:42 EEST 2014
On 05/17, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> Through this process, I'm coming to think that a ttoul-like function that
> also does range-checking would be worthwhile. It is just too easy to be
> lazy about range checks.
It could just be a wrapper for ttoul, and that could replace the manual checks
in plutomain, etc.. Although I did notice:
case 'x': /* --crlcheckinterval <time>*/
ugh = ttoul(optarg, 0, 10, &u);
if (ugh != NULL)
break;
crl_check_interval = u;
continue;
This is one that is not range checked. What would be a good ceiling for crl fetch intervals?
Matt
More information about the Swan-dev
mailing list