[Swan-dev] idea for libreswan LTS
David Clayton
daveclayton at ntlworld.com
Tue Feb 12 21:41:29 EET 2013
Whilst discussing this topic, I wanted to share the (I feel) very
successful release strategy adopted by LibreOffice
(https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan)
So far most of the major Linux distributions have kept pace, perhaps
this is because of the published release dates, releases being time based.
I don't know it it is appropriate to the Swan development, but perhaps
it would be worth considering the addition of an extra .point into the
version number to aid clarification, with LO as an example 3.6.5 is
defined as stable, whereas 4.0.0 is considered bleeding edge - I feel
the current 'patch' number doesn't provide the end user with enough
information to see if it is a new feature or a fix release.
Sorry if I keep on about LO, but lets say they have had two major
releases and under that five minor releases, and within that, a further
five point 'fixes' - that is a lot of releases, whereas I look at Swan
and think 2.6 > 2.6.39 should perhaps look more like 2.6 > 4.6.2
I'm a complete outsider, so please don't be offended, but I just thought
I would share my views :-)
David
More information about the Swan-dev
mailing list